Skip to main content

Java Functional Interfaces

 The term Java functional interface was introduced in Java 8. A functional interface in Java is an interface that contains only a single abstract (unimplemented) method. A functional interface can contain default and static methods which do have an implementation, in addition to the single unimplemented method.

Here is a Java functional interface example:

public interface MyFunctionalInterface {
public void execute();
}

The above counts as a functional interface in Java because it only contains a single method, and that method has no implementation. Normally a Java interface does not contain implementations of the methods it declares, but it can contain implementations in default methods, or in static methods. Below is another example of a Java functional interface, with implementations of some of the methods:

public interface MyFunctionalInterface2{
public void execute();

public default void print(String text) {
System.out.println(text);
}

public static void print(String text, PrintWriter writer) throws IOException {
writer.write(text);
}
}

The above interface still counts as a functional interface in Java, since it only contains a single non-implemented method.

Functional Interfaces Can Be Implemented by a Lambda Expression

A Java functional interface can be implemented by a Java Lambda Expression. Here is an example that implements the functional interface MyFunctionalInterface defined in the beginning of this Java functional interface tutorial:

MyFunctionalInterface lambda = () -> {
System.out.println("Executing...");
}

A Java lambda expression implements a single method from a Java interface. In order to know what method the lambda expression implements, the interface can only contain a single unimplemented method. In other words, the interface must be a Java functional interface.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Spring Security with JWT for REST API

Spring is considered a trusted framework in the Java ecosystem and is widely used. It’s no longer valid to refer to Spring as a framework, as it’s more of an umbrella term that covers various frameworks. One of these frameworks is Spring Security , which is a powerful and customizable authentication and authorization framework. It is considered the de facto standard for securing Spring-based applications. Despite its popularity, I must admit that when it comes to single-page applications , it’s not simple and straightforward to configure. I suspect the reason is that it started more as an MVC application -oriented framework, where webpage rendering happens on the server-side and communication is session-based. If the back end is based on Java and Spring, it makes sense to use Spring Security for authentication/authorization and configure it for stateless communication. While there are a lot of articles explaining how this is done, for me, it was still frustrating to set it up for the f

Why do I need to override the equals and hashCode methods in Java?

  Imagine you have this MyClass first = new MyClass( "a" , "first" ); MyClass second = new MyClass( "a" , "second" ); Override only  equals If only  equals  is overriden, then when you call  myMap.put(first,someValue)  first will hash to some bucket and when you call  myMap.put(second,someOtherValue)  it will hash to some other bucket (as they have a different  hashCode ). So, although they are equal, as they don't hash to the same bucket, the map can't realize it and both of them stay in the map. Although it is not necessary to override  equals()  if we override  hashCode() , let's see what would happen in this particular case where we know that two objects of  MyClass  are equal if their  importantField  is equal but we do not override  equals() . Override only  hashCode If you only override  hashCode  then when you call  myMap.put(first,someValue)  it takes first, calculates its  hashCode  and stores it in a given bucket. Then wh

Momo suicide game

Microsoft clamps down on sick 'Momo suicide game' in 'Minecraft' Microsoft is clamping down on the sick “Momo suicide challenge,” which recently infiltrated the wildly popular online game “Minecraft.”The tech giant owns “Minecraft” developer Mojang. The vile “Momo suicide game” has been garnering attention after spreading on WhatsApp, prompting police warnings. "Momo" is a viral challenge that asks people to add a contact via WhatsApp - they are then   urged   to commit self-harm or suicide. The "game" has fueled comparisons to the sinister " Blue Whale challenge " that led to reports of suicides in Russia and the U.S, as well as the online fictional character of "Slender Man." In 2014 two 12-year-old girls in Wisconsin  attempted to kill   a classmate in an attempt to please the horror character. The Buenos Aires Times recently  reported  that police in Argentina are investigating whether “Momo” is linked to the suicide of a 12-y